1. 阅读下列短文,从每题所给的A、B、C和D四个选项中选出最佳选项。

Jorg Muller, an ecologist at the University of Würzburg, with his colleagues, proposes a way to measure the biodiversity—listen to the jungle by AI, in a paper published in Nature Communications.

The rainforests are very important and always alive with the sounds of animals, which is useful to ecologists. When it comes to measuring the biodiversity of a piece of land, listening out for animal caller is more effective than uncovering the bushes looking for tracks and paw prints. The latter analysis method is time-consuming, and it requires an expert pair of ears. Muller's idea was to apply the principle of smartphone apps which can identify the sounds of birds, bats and mammals to conservation work.

The researchers took recordings from across 43 sites in the rainforests. Some sites were relatively primitive, old-growth forests. Others were areas that had just been cleared for pasture(牧场) recently. And some other original forests had been cleared but then abandoned, allowing themselves to regrow. The various calls were identified by an expert,and then used to construct a list of the species present. As expected, the longer the land had been free from agricultural activity, the greater biodiversity it hosted. Then it was the computer's turn. "We found that the AI tools could identify the sounds as well as the experts," says Dr. Muller.

Of course, not everything in a rainforest makes a noise. Dr. Muller and his colleagues used light traps to catch night-flying insects, and DNA analysis to identify them. They found that the diversity of noisy animals was a reliable representative for the diversity of the quieter ones, too.

Besides measuring the biodiversity, the results are also expected to be applied to outside ecology departments. Under pressure from their customers, firms like L'Oreal, a make-up company, and Shell, an oil firm, have been spending money on forest restoration projects around the world. Dr. Muller hopes that an automated approach to checking on the results could help monitor such efforts, and give a standard way to measure whether they are working as well as their sponsors say.

(1) Why does Muller propose to measure biodiversity with AI? A. To make a new conservation principle. B. To seek away fit for hot environments. C. To work more efficiently than manpower D. To study the rainforests more specifically.
(2) How was the identification work of AI tools on the 43 sites? A. It agreed with the work from experts.. B. It identified different types of raintarests. C. It recorded more sounds in the abandoned forests. D. It was used to restore the biodiversity for pasture.
(3) What does the author indicate in paragraph 4? A. DNA analysis is skeptical in the research. B. Quiet animals are as diverse as noisy ones. C. A rainforest is always full of various noises. D. AI technology is used to catch the insects.
(4) What can be inferred from the last paragraph? A. The research focuses on biodiversity only. B. L'Oreal and Shell develop monitoring apps. C. The research will assist in forest restoration. D. AI's help will attract some sponsors'investment.
【考点】
推理判断题; 细节理解题; 说明文; 科普类;
【答案】

您现在未登录,无法查看试题答案与解析。 登录
阅读理解 未知 普通
能力提升
真题演练
换一批
1. 阅读理解

"It's absolutely safe to say that animals are beneficial to our mental and physical health," says Nancy, director of the Center for Human-Animal Interaction at Virginia Commonwealth University. Nancy says evidence is accumulating that levels of the stress drop in people after just 5 to 20 minutes' interaction with dogs — even if it's not their pet. And it's not just humans that benefit from these brief exchanges. "We see the same thing in the dogs when they interact with humans," Nancy says.

Now, the therapy dogs used in research are screened for things like friendliness, good behavior and responsiveness. They're not necessarily going to be great for every single person. But for people who get it and connect with the animals, they can make a big difference.

Research on the health benefits of human interactions with animals, especially with dogs, has exploded in recent years. Though the field is still young, the quality of the evidence is improving as new research begins to include more randomly controlled trials looking at short interactions.

So how does hanging out with dogs help us focus? Mueller, whose research focuses on the psychology of human-animal relationships, says dogs drive us to experience the world more like they do. Animals, particularly dogs, live in the moment, experiencing their environment with wonder all the time. Watching dogs sniff the grass or explore the world around them cues us to pay more attention, too. There's some evidence that the act of actually touching a dog might be an important part of their calming effect.

But it's not just how we clue to dogs that makes the relationship special. They can connect with another human being. And they do it without the ability to use words. As my dog-loving 9-year-old kid recently told me, dogs just have a way of speaking to our hearts.

(1) What do Nancy's words lead us to believe? A. Pet dogs have long-term benefits for their owners. B. Stress levels accumulate for people without pets. C. A brief interaction with dogs benefits both sides. D. It's necessary to keep pets for our mental health.
(2) Where does the new research differ from the previous research? A. It has random trials with brief interactions. B. It focuses on the effect of activities on pets. C. It includes therapy dogs for health screening. D. It ensures the research proper for everyone.
(3) What does the author want to stress by mentioning his kid? A. The importance of pet ownership for kids. B. Evidence of pets' interaction with humans. C. Man's skills to understand clues from pets. D. Dogs' ability to relate to humans' feelings.
(4) What is the text mainly about? A. Pets can relate to us positively. B. Pet dogs bring shared benefits. C. Research about our mental health. D. Psychology of human-pet bond.
阅读理解 未知 普通
2. 阅读理解

B

My wife and I have always had a non-negotiable when looking for a place to rent: a gas stove. We love cooking together, and countless food shows have impressed upon us that there is nothing more essential to a tasty meal than a flame(火焰). 

Then came the shift of work forcing us to move into a new apartment with an induction (电磁感应)cooker. Past encounters with the slow and inconsistent heating elements of early electric stoves had soured us to the idea of cooking with electricity, but it took only a couple of days for us to realize that our new induction cooker was far superior: Water boiled at lightning speed; I could set a timer and walk away knowing the heat would automatically turn off. 

Our belated switch to induction came amid a rise of horrifying stories about the health and climate risks of gas stoves. Studies have found cooking with gas is like having secondhand smoke in the kitchen. Worse still, the primary ingredient that fuels gas stoves is methane, a greenhouse gas 80 times more harmful to the environment than carbon dioxide. That's why I finally quit using gas stoves and abandoned my prior conviction that I could never live in a home without one.

Don't get me wrong-there's still a place for flame, and there's a reason why barbecued food is so delicious. Barbecuing food impart s special flavour that you can't experience with an electric cooker. But dishes that truly require cooking over an open flame are the exception, not the rule.

Changing the fundamentals of our lives is hard. But just as we have stopped commuting by horse, or have replaced a coal fireplace with central heating, it's time to move gas out of our kitchens. Some might be horrified. The rest of us, though, can step calmly into the future. Hopefully the governments, too, will soon smell the gas.

(1) How did the author feel about cooking with early electric stoves? A. Unpleasant. B. Concerned. C. Panicky. D. Stressed.
(2) What can be inferred from paragraph 4? A. The author regrets giving up gas stoves. B. Barbecued food is tastier and healthier. C. It is a common practice to cook outdoors. D. Gas stoves still have a role to play.
(3) What does the author want to convey in the last paragraph? A. Be open to changes. B. Be brave in the face of uncertainty. C. The old should give way to the new. D. Governments should be gas advocates.
(4) What's the best title of the text? A. Barbecue: Tasty or Risky B. A New "Flame" Has Come C. Gas Stoves: To Leave or to Stay D. Electricity Has Taken the Lead
阅读理解 未知 普通
3.阅读理解

We are a culture drowning in our possessions. We take in more and more (holiday, birthdays, sales, needs), but rarely find an opportunity to get rid of it. As a result, our homes fill up with so much stuff. And because we believe the best solution is to find organizational tools to manage all of it, we seek out bigger containers or more efficient organizational tips and tricks. But simply organizing our stuff must be repeated over and over.

At its heart, organizing is simply rearranging. And though we may find storage solutions to- day, we are quickly forced to find new ones as early as tomorrow. Additionally, organizing has some other major shortcomings that are rarely considered. For example, it doesn't benefit anyone else. The possessions we rarely use sit on shelves in our basements or garages, even while some of our closest friends desperately need them.

On the other hand, the act of getting rid of stuff from our home accomplishes many purposes. It is not a temporary solution. It is an action of permanence-once an item has been removed, it is removed completely. Whether we re-sell our possessions, donate them to charity, or give them to a friend, they are immediately put to use by those who need them.

Removing possessions begins to turn back our desire for more as we find freedom and happiness in owning less. And removing ourselves from the all-consuming desire to own more creates opportunities for significant life changes to take place.

If you're struggling with how to get rid of stuff, you can first challenge yourself to remove the unneeded things in your home, carry a trash bag from room-to-room, see how big of a donation pile you can make, and even eliminate debt by selling what you no longer need.

It doesn't matter how you remove them, for it is far better to remove than to always organize.

(1) What is the problem with simply organizing stuff? A. Few tools and tricks are available. B. It needs to be repeated very often. C. People cannot save money by organizing. D. Desire to buy more disappears by organizing.
(2) How can we remove unnecessary possessions? A. By reselling them to others. B. By keeping them in trash bags. C. By storing them in the garage. D. By piling them on the shelves.
(3) What does the underlined word "eliminate" mean in Paragraph 5? A. get rid of B. get over C. add to D. take charge of
(4) What is the purpose of the passage? A. To explain the advantages and disadvantages of organizing things. B. To inform readers of the ways to get rid of unnecessary possessions. C. To call for people to remove stuff instead of just organizing. D. To appeal to people to make donations to people in need.
阅读理解 常考题 普通