1.阅读理解

On James Owen's 70th birthday, he saw a video of himself walking with difficulty up to the stage where he was giving a talk. "I looked like an old man," says Owen, who built a successful career on Wall Street.

He was about 25 pounds overweight and had chronic trouble with his back, knees, and shoulders. But instead of giving in to age, Owen decided to set an ambitious five-year goal: He wanted to be pain-free, and he decided the way to get there was through exercise--even though at the time he couldn't do a single push-up.

Owen began his new exercise regimen (养生计划) by walking, though he became out of breath after five minutes. But that didn't discourage him. He kept at the walks every day, along with some stretching, Once he had those basics down, he started weight lifting and hired a personal trainer to teach him and to design a routine he could follow on his own. The last piece was finding other activities he enjoyed, which turned out to be cycling and swimming.

In less than five years, Owen was able to do three sets of 50 push-ups each and walk for miles each day. And yes, he was free of aches and pains.

Owen used his experience to write a book called Just Move! A New Approach to Fitness After 50, in which he details how older adults can safely get off the couch and add more movement to their lives. The key: getting started, even if you walk just three blocks, which was all he could manage at first. "Think of it as movement, not exercise," he says. "The key is slow and steady progress."

Now 81 and retired, Owen exercises an hour a day, six days a week. "It is the best investment I've ever made in my life," he says.

(1) Why did Owen make up his mind to do exercise? A. To celebrate his 70th birthday. B. To get rid of his physical pain. C. To write a book about exercise. D. To find a hobby after retirement.
(2) What is the third paragraph mainly about? A. The exercise he preferred to do. B. The routine his trainer designed for him. C. The difficulty he met during exercise. D. The process he undertook to keep fit.
(3) What advice did Owen give to the people after 50 in his book? A. They should invest on Wall Street. B. They should only do some slow exercise. C. They should do exercise step by step. D. They should exercise an hour a day.
【考点】
细节理解题; 段落大意; 故事阅读类; 记叙文;
【答案】

您现在未登录,无法查看试题答案与解析。 登录
阅读理解 模拟题 普通
能力提升
真题演练
换一批
1.阅读下列短文,从每题所给的ABCD四个选项中选出最佳选项。

In the workplace, we have to deal with different people, and the best way to do that is to find empathy to better understand them. Here are three fruit personalities and how best to deal with them. 

Apple: hard core, doesn't brulse easlly

Apple types are direct and don't suffer fools. They are fast, logical thinkers who love to win and hate to lose control. They'll get a result at any cost, but see conflict as sport. 

Managing apples: 

·Have your facts (or suffer the consequences)

·Always stand up to them. 

·Get to the point. 

·Be fast and logical. 

·Watch and learn- they make great mentors. 

Lemon: intense and concentrated

Lemons love structure, detail, order and rules. They are worriers who like safety, security and predictability. They love detail and are awesome at spotting gaps in a plan. But too many rules can be frustrating to others. 

Managing lemons: 

·Respect their need for space and time; give them plenty of notice. 

·Slow your pace if you're fast, quieten down if you're loud. 

·Don't surprise them. 

·Don't threaten their security. 

·Know you can never give too much detail. 

Banana: sweet and soft

Banana types enjoy harmony in the workplace and shy away from conflict. They have loads of empathy. They are excellent in customer service roles, yet they can irritate people by being too nice. 

When they're too accommodating, they can be seen as indecisive. 

Managing bananas: 

·Don't pressure them, but motivate. 

·Encourage their opinions, and listen. 

·Don't overload them with your problems. 

·Provide regular feedback opportunities. 

·Be nice-that's all they want.

(1) Which way is proper to deal with the lemon personality? A. Talking loudly. B. Making some rules. C. Thinking logically. D. Giving more details.
(2) What does the banana personality think of conflict? A. Appealing. B. Unwelcome. C. Useful. D. Harmful.
(3) Who is the text mainly intended for? A. Housewives. B. Students. C. Employees. D. Customers.
阅读理解 未知 普通
2. 阅读理解

We often think about relationships on a scale from positive to negative. We are drawn to loving family members, caring classmates and supportive mentors. We do our best to avoid the cruel uncle, the playground bully and the jerk boss.

But the most toxic relationships aren't the purely negative ones. They're the ones that are a mix of positive and negative. We often call them frenemies, supposed friends who sometimes help you and sometimes hurt you. But ifs not just friends. It's the in-laws who volunteer to watch your kids but belittle your parenting. The manager who praises your work but denies you a promotion.

Everyone knows how relationships like that can tie your stomach into a knot. But groundbreaking research led by the psychologists Bert Uchino and Julianne Holt-Lunstad shows that ambivalent (矛盾情绪的) relationships can be damaging to your health — even more than purely negative relationships.

I had assumed that with a neighbor or a colleague, having some positive interactions was better than all negative interactions. But being cheered on by the same person who cuts you down doesn't reduce the bad feelings; it increases them. And it's not just in your head: It leaves a trace in your heart and your blood.

Even a single ambivalent interaction can cause harm. In one experiment, people gave impromptu speeches on controversial topics in front of a friend who offered feedback. The researchers had randomly assigned the friend to give ambivalent or negative comments. Receiving mixed feedback caused higher blood pressure than pure criticism. "I would have gone about the topic differently, but you're doing fine" proved to be more distressing than "I totally disagree with everything you've said."

The evidence that ambivalent relationships can be bad for us is strong, but the reasons can be harder to read — just like the relationships themselves.

The most intuitive reason is that ambivalent relationships are unpredictable. With a clear enemy, you put up a shield when you cross paths. With a frenemy, you never know whether Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde is going to show up. Feeling unsure can disrupt the body's calming system and activate a fight-or-flight response. It's unsettling to hope for a hug while also preparing for a likely quarrel.

Another factor is that unpleasant interactions are more painful in an ambivalent relationship. It's more upsetting to be let down by people you like sometimes than by people you dislike all the time. When someone stabs you in the back, it stings more if he's been friendly to your face.

(1) Which of the following can be counted as a frenemy? A. Your neighbour's kid who advises you to study hard but idles away his own time. B. Your classmate who admires your diligence at first, but doubts your intelligence later. C. Your mother's friend who encourages you to spend more time on homework but less on smart phones. D. Your father's colleague who proposes you to do a moderate amount of homework while ensuring adequate sleep.
(2) Which of the following statements can be inferred from the passage? A. Ambivalent relationships have a permanent effect on your well-being. B. The common cause for high blood pressure is ambivalent relationship. C. Ambivalent interactions will be more painful if it is done consciously. D. The negative impact of ambivalent interactions is direct and strong.
(3) The underlined word "belittle" in paragraph 2 probably means ____. A. devalue B. appreciate C. respect D. abuse
(4) Which of the following might be the best title for the passage? A. Some Negative Relationships Are Bad for Your Health B. Your Most Ambivalent Relationships Are the Most Toxic C. The Reasons for Ambivalent Relationships Are Unpredictable D. Some Positive Relationships Are Better than All Negative Ones
阅读理解 未知 普通
3. 阅读下列短文,从每题所给的A、B、C和D四个选项中选出最佳选项。

Baidu, a Chinese search engine and artificial intelligence firm, announced its latest electric autonomous driving vehicle, Apollo RT6, on Thursday. The new vehicle is a fully electric vehicle with a steering wheel (方向盘) that can be removed when not required. It will cost ¥250,000 per unit. 

"The steering-wheel-free design allows more space for extra seating or other additions and the massive cost reduction will enable us to put tens of thousands of autonomous vehicles into operation across China," Robin Li, co-founder and CEO of Baidu, said at the firm's Baidu World Conference Thursday. "We are moving towards a future where taking a robotaxi will be half the cost of taking a taxi today."

Baidu already runs Apollo Go and Apollo Moon, taxi services using self-driving robotaxis with safety staff seated in the driver or passenger seat. They have been in operation in big cities like Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and Guangzhou, although the service is limited to specific areas. The new vehicle will soon join those robotaxis. 

The RT6 has reached the industry's Level 4 out of five possible levels of technology. That means its systems can operate without a driver but must be pre-loaded with a detailed map, thus limiting the areas where the vehicles can operate. Lower levels of self-driving technology have been available for decades. For example, many Level-3 vehicles allow hands-free highway driving. Other kinds of self-driving robot vehicles are already widely used in factories warehouses and other tightly controlled settings. 

Compared to previous generations where the technology was mainly used on conventional vehicles, the Apollo RT6 was designed specifically with fully autonomous driving in mind. 

Baidu is best known for its search engine and online advertising services, but in recent years it has invested heavily in autonomous driving and artificial intelligence technology, including automated personal assistants and AI chips.

(1) What can we know about Apollo RT6? A. It is free to run in any area. B. It has to operate with a driver. C. It will be cheaper to operate. D. It can work without a detailed map.
(2) The technology of a fully self-driving vehicle should reach____. A. Level 2 B. Level 3 C. Level 4 D. Level 5
(3) What does the underlined word "it" in the last paragraph refer to? A. A personal assistant. B. A company. C. A search engine. D. A fully autonomous car.
(4) What can be a suitable title for the text? A. An Introduction to Baidu's Latest Vehicle: Apollo RT6 B. Baidu's Future Plan for Its Electric Vehicle: Apollo RT6 C. Limitations of the Level-4 Self-driving Electric Vehicles D. The Great Market Potential for Fully Autonomous Vehicles
阅读理解 未知 普通