1.阅读理解

Dogs have been man's best friends for 30,000 years—and now scientists think they know why.

Dogs are usually not relaxed in a lab environment, but with a little petting and lots of treats, they can be trained to sit still even in an MRI (磁共振成像) scanner. That's how researchers at Hungary's ELTE University were able to get images of their brains at work.

Researcher Attila Andics said it helped them better understand the dogs' relationship with humans. "We have known for a long time that dogs and humans share similar social environment, but now our results show that dogs and humans also have similar brain mechanisms (方法;机制) to process social information," said Andics.

After training 11 dogs to stay motionless while their brains were scanned, the researchers checked their neurological (神经系统的) responses to about 200 emotionally

significant sounds, from whining and crying to playful barking and laughing. They then compared the responses from human subjects. They found great similarities. Andics said it opened new possibilities for the research.

"It establishes a foundation of a new branch of comparative neuroscience, because until now it was not possible to measure the brain activities of a non-primate and a primate (灵长类) brain in a single experiment," said Andies.

Evan Maclean, Professor in Duke University, said that the Hungarian results were an important step forward.

"We've known for a long time that dogs have a lot of behavioral similarities compared to humans. But we don't know anything or very little at least about whether some of these behaviors are represented similarly inside the brain of the dog, so this research is providing a first glimpse into whether these behavioral similarities are underlined by similar neural processes," said MacLean.

The Hungarian scientists tell ordinary dog owners to treat their dog companions as intelligent friends, not mere animals, because they evidently understand human feelings.

(1) Why were treats used in the research? A. To reduce dogs' nervousness. B. To help dogs live a still life. C. To find out dogs' favorite food. D. To analyze dogs' images of brains.
(2)  Through the new research, the scientists find that ____. A. dogs are unlikely to understand human feelings B. dogs eagerly accept human beings as their best friends C. dogs tend to have different responses to different sounds D. dogs are close to humans in processing social information
(3) The researchers compare the neurological responses of the dogs with those of human subjects by ____. A. analyzing their physical movements B. observing their facial expressions C. measuring brain activities through scanning D. assessing their different vocalizations
(4)  How should we treat dogs according to the scientists? A. Treating them as private property. B. Considering them as smart creatures. C. Regarding them as wild animals. D. Viewing them as tools for specific tasks.
(5)  What is the value of the research? A. To call on dog owners to treat dogs well. B. To advance the research on dogs' brains. C. To establish comparative neuroscience. D. To reveal why dogs are men's best friends.
【考点】
推理判断题; 细节理解题; 新闻报道类; 其他类; 应用文;
【答案】

您现在未登录,无法查看试题答案与解析。 登录
阅读理解 未知 困难
能力提升
真题演练
换一批
1.阅读理解

Body mass index (BMI) has long been foundational in healthcare around the world. The simple equation (方程) of weight relative to height has been used to determine your risk for certain diseases. But researchers have been questioning the value of BMI in individual health assessment now.

BMI was never intended to measure individual health. It was developed in the early 1800s to study weight variations across entire population. "BMI is a rigid number based on old data," says Fatima Stanford, a professor at Harvard Medical School. And it's far from perfect in terms of the cutoffs (分界点) designed to indicate risk, she added.

A study estimated that more than 74 million American adults were miscategorized (被误分类) as unhealthy or healthy based on their BMI alone. Nearly half of people considered over weight and 29 percent categorized as obese were actually healthy. Thirty percent of those considered to be at a normal weight had heart issues.

Part of the problem is that BMI doesn't tell the difference between weight from fat and muscle. So bodybuilders and athletes with high muscle mass may be categorized as overweight or obese. And even among people who do have higher body fat, BMI doesn't tell physicians anything about how the fat is distributed —a key connection to disease risk.

Furthermore, BMI cutoffs are largely based on data from western populations, making it a problem to apply this measurement to the diverse American population. There's growing evidence that body composition varies from race to race. African Americans, for example, are likely to carry more fat around the hips than white Americans. A study showed that for black adults in the U.S., having a higher BMI (25 and over) did not carry the same risk of death as it did in white adults.

Regardless of the BMI category you fall into, it's important to find a healthcare provider who will look beyond that number to get a whole picture of your health. Because despite the view that people with a higher BMI have a greater risk for a number of diseases than thinner people, the research shows it's not that simple.

(1) What do we know about BMI? A. It acts a decisive part in healthcare. B. It does well indicating health risks. C. It's intended to measure individual health. D. It shows the relation between weight and height.
(2) Why may some bodybuilders and athletes be miscategorized as overweight? A. They provided wrong data. B. BMI took their muscle for fat. C. BMI failed to indicate fat distribution. D. No other measurements were used than BMI.
(3) Which of the following is right according to Paragraph 5? A. BMI cutoff of African Americans is 25. B. BMI is accurate for people from different races. C. BMI cutoffs can't apply to all the people in the U.S. D. White adults are less likely to carry the risk of death than black adults.
(4) What is the author's attitude towards BMI? A. Cautious. B. Dependent. C. Convinced. D. Refusing.
阅读理解 未知 普通
2. 阅读理解

Scientists have discovered a new way of administering oxygen to the blood which could allow people to stay alive without breathing. The proccdure, which works by injecting oxygen molecules (分子) enclosed in fauly molecules directly into the bloodstream, could extend an extra 30 minutes of life when they cannot breathe.

John Kheir, a doctor of the Boston Children's Hospital, was inspired to begin his groundbreaking research after he experienced a patient's tragic death, according to Science Daily. He was operating on a young girl whose pneumonia led to deadly brain damage after doctors were unable to place her on a breathing machine in lime to save her.

In response, Dr Kheir started working on the idea of inserting oxygen directly into the blood. Early experiments showed that the intervention could in theory be very successful, he said, "We drew each other's blood, mixed it in a test tube with the microparticles, and watched blue blood turn immediately red, right before our eyes. IIowever, injecting pure oxygen into the bloodstream in gas form failed miscrably when it was allcmpled 100 years ago, as it formed dangerous bubbles in he veins (静脉) .

Much of Dr Kheir's research therefore involved finding a substance which could surround the oxygen and allow it to be suspended in a liquid for injection into the body. He found that using fatty molecules was the best way to keep oxygen after using sound waves to trap the two substances together into small particles that can only be seen with the help of a microscope. The particles were then made up into a liquid which is very heavily oxygenated—carrying "three to four limes the oxygen content of our own red blood cells", according to Dr Kheir.

When used on humans, the oxygen could probably last for up to 30 minutes, though injecting it for any longer could damage the patient's blood. "This is a short-term oxygen substitute—a way to safely inject oxygen gas to support patients during a critical few minutes," Dr Kheir said. He added that he thought the technique could become routine for doctors dealing with emergency situations.

(1) What is the second paragraph mainly about?  A. John Kheir made a mistake in an operation. B. An incident enlightened John Kheir's research. C. John Kheir failed to inject oxygen to a girl's blood. D. A young patient died tragically in John Kheir's research.
(2) What problem may lead to the failure of previous trials?  A. The blue blood can tur red only in theory. B. The micropartictes fail to mix with oxygen. C. Administering oxygen to the blood is difficult. D. Oxygen gas inscrted may cause more serious problems.
(3) Ilow did Dr Kheir solve the problem to successfully inject oxygen to the blood?  A. To surround oxygen molecules with fat. B. To use sound waves to turn gas into liquid. C. To involve more oxygen into red blood cells. D. To find a liquid with the aid of a microscope.
(4) What is Dr Kheir's attitude towards the new way?  A. Unclear. B. Doubtful. C. Subjective. D. Hopeful.
阅读理解 未知 困难
3.阅读理解

The captain of the ship, the Beagle, wanted someone who would "profit by the opportunity of visiting distant countries yet little known". The person who answered the call was not the captain's first choice. It was a young man who had left medical school without completing his degree. What's more, he had recently received a letter from his father predicting that he would be "a disgrace to yourself and all your family". Despite all this, his adventures on this ship would lead to one of the most important scientific discoveries of all time.

The young man in question, Charles Darwin, was a geologist and naturalist, fascinated by rocks, plants and animals. The journey gave him the chance to study various living things in their natural environments. After Darwin had spent some time in South America, his room on the ship was crowded with samples of the plants and animals he had collected. As he studied these, he asked himself the question: how did different species come to exist?

At that time, people believed that all species had appeared on Earth at the same time, and had not changed since. But Darwin began to think differently. He noticed that some species of animals were very similar to each other. Maybe animals evolved as they adapted to their changing environments. It was just an idea, but enough to inspire Darwin to look for more evidence. When the Beagle reached the Galapagos Islands in 1835, Darwin saw a variety of new species, but it was the birds that interested him the most. Darwin noticed that there was a difference between the finches (雀科小鸟) on each of the islands. It seemed their beaks (鸟喙) had evolved according to what food was available on that particular island.

Darwin suspected the finches had evolved from a common ancestor, which had arrived on the islands a long time before. Over time, it had slowly evolved into many new species. And that was the answer to how new species of plants and animals came to exist: they evolved from earlier ancestors.

It was a completely new idea — a theory of evolution. Darwin explained this theory in his book, On the Origin of Species. Many people refused to believe that living things, including humans, had evolved from lower forms of life. But Darwin's scientific studies were so convincing that more and more people started to believe his theory.

Today, On the Origin of Species has changed ideas about life on Earth forever. And it all began with the journey on the Beagle.

(1) Why did the captain of the Beagle choose Darwin to sail together? A. Because he appreciated Darwin's talent and wanted to offer some help. B. Because he had recently received a letter asking for help from Darwin's father. C. Because he hoped this valuable expedition would also benefit someone who needed it. D. Because he thought Darwin's adventures might lead to an important scientific discovery.
(2) Which of the following is the correct order to describe Darwin's exploration?

①Darwin suspected that the finches had evolved from a common ancestor.

②Darwin proposed a theory that living things had evolved from lower forms of life.

③Darwin wanted to know how different species came to exist.

④Darwin noticed there was a difference between the finches on the Galapagos Islands.

⑤Darwin studied various living things in their natural environments.

A. ⑤③④①② B. ⑤④①③② C. ③④①⑤② D. ③⑤②④①
(3) What was people's original attitude towards Darwin's book, On the Origin of Species? A. Supportive. B. Critical. C. Neutral. D. Suspicious.
(4) Which of the following would be the main idea of this text? A. Darwin's interest in various living things made him a great naturalist. B. Darwin's journey on the Beagle inspired his Theory of Evolution. C. Darwin went on a journey to confirm his scientific discovery. D. Darwin's discovery has changed ideas about life on Earth.
阅读理解 模拟题 普通