1.阅读下列短文, 从每题所给的A、B、C和D四个选项中, 选出最佳选项。

Thousands of years of domestication have left dogs with a remarkable capacity to comprehend human speech, and new research reveals that the brains of our four-legged friends are even able to differentiate between languages. Appearing in the journal Neurolmage, the new study is the first to detect such an ability in any non-human animal.

To conduct their research, the study authors trained 18 pet dogs to lie motionless inside a functional magnetic resonance imaging(fMRI)scanner so that their brain activity could be recorded while they listened to audio recordings of human speech. Two of the dogs involved in the study came from homes that spoke Spanish, while the remaining 16 belonged to Hungarian-speaking families.

While in the scanner, each dog listened to an excerpt(节选)from Antoine de Saint-Exupéry's The Little Prince in both Spanish and Hungarian. They also heard scrambled(杂乱的)versions of these recordings that made no sense and sounded completely unnatural.

When examining the responses of the dogs' brains to these recordings, the researchers noted that activity patterns within the animals' primary auditory cortex(听觉皮层)differed depending on whether they heard actual speech or scrambled nonsense. This suggests that dogs are indeed able to tell the difference between speech and non-speech, regardless of the language spoken.

The researchers also found that this response to language was more pronounced in older dogs, leading them to conclude that longer exposure to human speech enables pet dogs to improve their language recognition skills.

In a statement, study author Attila Andic explained these findings indicate that "the capacity to learn about the regularities of a language is not uniquely human. "However, it remains to be seen "whether this capacity is dogs' specialty, or general among non-human species. "

"Indeed, it is possible that the brain changes from the tens of thousands of years that dogs have been living with humans have made them better language listeners, but this is not necessarily the case. "

(1) What is the requirement for the dogs in the study? A. They must be smart. B. They can study languages. C. They must keep still. D. They can train their partners.
(2) How did the researchers get their findings? A. By consulting language experts. B. By collecting clinical data. C. By observing the dogs' body movements. D. By analyzing the dogs' brain activity.
(3) What can we infer about the findings from Attila Andic's explanation? A. They have proved his assumption. B. They need further confirming. C. They are in line with the former ones. D. They apply to non-human species.
(4) Which of the following can be the best title for the text? A. Older Dogs Can Learn New Tricks B. Dogs Are Good Language Learners C. Older Dogs Are Humans' Perfect Partners D. Dogs Can Distinguish Different Languages
【考点】
推理判断题; 细节理解题; 科普环保类; 说明文; 标题选择;
【答案】

您现在未登录,无法查看试题答案与解析。 登录
阅读理解 常考题 普通
能力提升
真题演练
换一批
1.阅读理解

Drew Lanham grew up on the farm his grandfather built in the 1920s. Lanham, now 54, says his father felt a responsibility to stay on the land and care for the animals and crops planted there. "I saw my father through the land, and I saw the land as my father's heart," he said.

As a kid, he remembers being attracted by the wildlife he would encounter on the short walk between his parents' farm and his grandparents' house. Even though the journey was less than a quarter-mile, he recalled, back then it "seemed like a thousand miles".

Above all, he was captivated(迷住) by the birds."From a very early age, I believed that I would be someone who studied birds-who somehow found a way to fly,"Lanham said. He said he lost track of that dream on the road to becoming an engineer. "Once I left for college, everybody said," You're good at math and science. Be an engineer, Drew,'" he said.

As a student studying engineering at Clemson University, it was a trip to the farm that helped him circle back to his love of birds. "I can remember coming back home, and all of these wonderful forests that I'd grown up in had been cleared away. And losing that land was like losing my father all over again," he said. Lanham's father had died years before.

Though much of their home had been destroyed, some wildlife remained. "I remember when I drove on the dirt road, I heard birds singing. It was the most hopeful thing for me," he said. The bird songs li t a fire under Lanham. After his visit back to the farm, he couldn't see himself returning to work as an engineer. At Clemson he got on track to study to become an ornithologist(鸟类学家).

"The long hours of work were often hot and hard. But when I looked up, there would be flocks(群) of birds. I realized I was doing what I had always dreamed of,"he said.

(1) Why did Lanham feel the journey to his grandparents' house like a thousand miles? A. He used to get lost during the journey. B. He was eager to go to his grandparents' house. C. He often stopped to care for the animals and crops. D. He spent much time exploring the wildlife along the way.
(2) What made Lanham decide to give up studying engineering? A. His weakness in math and science. B. His father's persuasion. C. His return trip to the farm. D. His vacation in the forests.
(3) What did Lanham think of the work as an ornithologist? A. Exciting but dangerous. B. Repetitive but rewarding. C. Creative but boring. D. Tough but meaningful.
(4) What can we learn from Lanham's experience? A. Even if the dream cannot come true, we should not give up. B. The happiest thing in the world is to pursue your dream. C. Dreams are today's answers to tomorrow's questions. D. Dreams are always the opposite of reality.
阅读理解 未知 普通
2.阅读理解

As cities balloon with growth, access to nature for people living in urban areas is becoming harder to find. If you're lucky, there might be a pocket park near where you live, but it's unusual to find places in a city that are relatively wild.

Past research has found health and wellness benefits of nature for humans, but a new study shows that wildness in urban areas is extremely important for human well-being.

The research team focused on a large urban park. They surveyed several hundred park-goers, asking them to submit a written summary online of a meaningful interaction they had with nature in the park. The researchers then examined these submissions, coding (编码) experiences into different categories. For example, one participant's experience of "We sat and listened to the waves at the beach for a while" was assigned the categories "sitting at beach" and "listening to waves."

Across the 320 submissions, a pattern of categories the researchers call a "nature language" began to emerge. After the coding of all submissions, half a dozen categories were noted most often as important to visitors. These include encountering wildlife, walking along the edge of water, and following an established trail.

Naming each nature experience creates a usable language, which helps people recognize and take part in the activities that are most satisfying and meaningful to them. For example, the experience of walking along the edge of water might be satisfying for a young professional on a weekend hike in the park. Back downtown during a workday, they can enjoy a more domestic form of this interaction by walking along a fountain on their lunch break.

"We're trying to generate a language that helps bring the human-nature interactions back into our daily lives. And for that to happen, we also need to protect nature so that we can interact with it," said Peter Kahn, a senior author of the study.

(1) What phenomenon does the author describe at the beginning of the text? A. Pocket parks are now popular.  B. Wild nature is hard to find in cities. C. Many cities are overpopulated.  D. People enjoy living close to nature.
(2) Why did the researchers code participant submissions into categories? A. To compare different types of park-goers. B. To explain why the park attracts tourists. C. To analyze the main features of the park. D. To find patterns in the visitors' summaries.
(3) What can we learn from the example given in paragraph 5? A. Walking is the best way to gain access to nature. B. Young people are too busy to interact with nature. C. The same nature experience takes different forms. D. The nature language enhances work performance.
(4) What should be done before we can interact with nature according to Kahn? A. Language study. B. Environmental conservation. C. Public education. D. Intercultural communication.
阅读理解 未知 困难
3.阅读理解

I joined the coast guard because I wanted to help people. Hovercraft (气垫船) are rare and special. They've been discontinued in most commercial operations because they're so expensive to make, but when it comes to search and rescue, they're priceless.

From far away, a hovercraft looks like a normal boat. But if you look under its skirt, the craft is not touching the water —it floats on a cushion of air. That cushion allows us to travel over everything from water to muddy land — and even break through ice. We do all of that as a 70-tonne machine, going a maximum of nearly 120 kilometers per hour. These features allow us to rescue a large number of people quickly, get onto land, and get someone into an ambulance far easier than with any other device I can think of.

The advantages of hovercraft can also make them difficult to handle. We've got a massive vehicle moving fast, sometimes in a thick fog bank up a narrow river. During assignments on other coast guard ships, I had 20 minutes to make changes to avoid a crash. In a hovercraft, I have 10 seconds. You have to have enough situational awareness to make the right decision every time.

People call us for all sorts of problems: missing divers, on-board fires, or even when they've run out of fuel or had a mechanical breakdown. A container ship could burst into flames. We have a strong network here at the base to help everyone through difficult situations like that. Thankfully, we have captains who train us in a safe environment, but you don't ever get fully comfortable. Anything can throw the hovercraft off—maybe your lift settings are off a little, or the wind blows with a bit of extra weight. After several years operating a hovercraft, I'm still learning. Every one of the captains here agrees: you can drive this thing for 20 years and still be surprised.

(1)  What makes hovercraft unsuitable for commercial use? A. Their safety risks. B. Their poor durability. C. Their low efficiency. D. Their production costs.
(2) What is paragraph 2 mainly about? A. How a hovercraft works. B. What comprises a hovercraft. C. What distinguishes a hovercraft. D. How a hovercraft helps victims.
(3)  What challenge do hovercraft pose to the pilots? A. They have to make faster responses. B. They often face mechanical breakdowns. C. They need more people for decision making. D. They must consider the environmental concerns.
(4)  What does the author think of operating a hovercraft? A. Dull. B. Demanding. C. Enjoyable. D. Effortless.
阅读理解 未知 普通