1. 阅读理解

US forests could become a "substantial carbon source" by 2070, suggesting that forests could worsen global warming instead of easing it, a new Agriculture Department report says.

US forests currently absorb 11 percent of US carbon emissions (释放), equal to the combined emissions from 40 coal power plants. The report predicts that the ability of forests to absorb carbon will start declining after 2025 and that forests could emit up to 100 million metric tons of carbon a year as their emissions from decaying (腐烂) trees go beyond their carbon absorption.

The prediction suggests that this will require the US to cut emissions more rapidly to reach net zero, according to Lynn Riley, a senior manager of climate science. "Eleven percent of our domestic emissions. That is a really significant portion," Riley said. "As we work to decarbonize... forests are one of the greatest tools available. If we were to lose that, it means the US will contribute that much more" in emissions. The report also assesses and predicts the extent of renewable resources provided by the nation's forests and undeveloped landscapes, including farmlands, wetlands and grasslands.

According to the report, the loss of carbon absorption is driven in part by natural disasters which are increasing in frequency and strength as global temperatures rise. Development in forested areas, which the report predicts will continue to increase, is having the same effect as people increasingly move to the so-called wildland urban areas. Aging forests also contribute as older, mature trees absorb less carbon than younger trees of the same species, and the US forests are rapidly aging.

More aggressive forest management can help by cutting down a small portion of aging forests to make ways for younger trees that absorb more carbon. A thorough study of each forest should be done before removing older trees, Riley said.

(1) Why could US forests become a "substantial carbon source"? A. They fail to absorb enough carbon. B. They begin to emit carbon increasingly. C. They may emit more carbon than absorb. D. Mature trees outnumber young trees.
(2) Which of the following may Lynn Riley agree with? A. US forests have lost their role in carbon absorption. B. It is urgent for the US to reduce carbon emissions. C. The US has contributed to 11% carbon emissions. D. The loss of forests contributes to less carbon emissions.
(3) What leads to the loss of carbon absorption? A. Improper tree species. B. Removal of aging trees. C. Decreasing urban development. D. Frequent severe natural disasters.
(4) Which could be a suitable title for the text? A. Aging Forests —a Major Emitter of Carbon. B. Growing Forests —a Solution to Carbon Emissions. C. Reducing Forests —a Threat to Global Warming. D. Decaying Forests —a Consequence of Global Warming.
【考点】
推理判断题; 细节理解题; 说明文; 环境保护类; 标题选择;
【答案】

您现在未登录,无法查看试题答案与解析。 登录
阅读理解 未知 普通
能力提升
真题演练
换一批
1.阅读理解

The artificial-intelligence chatbot ChatGPT has shaken educators since its November release. New York City public schools have banned it from their networks, and professors are improving syllabus(教学大纲) to prevent students from using it to complete homework. The chatbot's creator, OpenAI, unveiled a tool to detect text generated by artificial intelligence to prevent abuse.

However, there is one subject area that doesn't seem threatened. It turns out ChatGPT is quite bad at math.

While the bot gets many basic arithmetic questions correct, it makes errors when those questions are written in natural language. For example, ask ChatGPT "if a banana weighs 0.5 lbs and I have 7 lbs of bananas and nine oranges, how many pieces of fruit do I have?" The bot's quick reply: "You have 16 pieces of fruit, seven bananas and nine oranges."

Debarghya Das, a search-engine engineer, tried to explain why this happens in his Twitter. "Just imagine if you ask a room of people who have no idea what math is but have read many hieroglyphics(象形文字), 'what comes after 2+2,' they might say, 'Usually, we see a 4.' That's exactly what ChatGPT is doing." But, he adds, "math isn't just a series of hieroplyphics, it's computation."

Another reason that math teachers are less worried by this revolution is that they have been here before. The field experienced dramatic changes for the first time decades ago with general availability of computers and calculators.

"Math has had the biggest revolution based on the system of any mainstream subject," said Conrad Wolfram, the strategic director of Wolfram Research, which developed Mathematica, a technical computing software program.

The broader lesson is that AI, computers and calculators aren't simply a shortcut. Math tools require math knowledge. A calculator can't do calculus unless you know what you're trying to solve.

In general, AI will likely ultimately be most useful for those who already know field well: They know the questions to ask, how to identify the shortcomings and what to do with the answer.

(1) What can we infer from paragraph 1 about ChatGPT? A. New York schools punished students who used it. B. Professors designed new syllabus with the help of it. C. It's possible for teachers to identify papers written by it. D. The government introduced some laws to prevent its abuse.
(2) How did Debarghya Das explain the reason why ChatGPT made errors in math? A. By setting an example B. By drawing a comparison C. By presenting some data D. By telling a related story
(3) Why are math teachers less likely to express concern about ChatGPT? A. They can use ChatGPT to solve arithmetic questions. B. They have already learnt the impact of technology on math. C. ChatGPT only understand questions written in natural language. D. ChatGPT usually gives misleading information in conversations.
(4) Who can find AI most useful in his field? A. A five-year old boy who is good at calculating. B. A pupil who wants to cheat in the math exam C. A professor who has read many hieroglyphics D. A math instructor struggling with math problems.
阅读理解 未知 普通
2. 阅读理解

Here're some of the excellent inventions in 2023. Which one do you like most?

Whiter Paint

The paint on a white building reflects 80 to 90% of the sunlight that strikes it. The rest of the light warms the surrounding area, raising air-conditioning bills. But the Whiter Paint is made of chemicals that better reflect UV rays. It reflects up to 98% of the sunlight, which could reduce AC use by 40%. "The heat is reflected into deep space," says Xiulin Ruan, who led the Purdue University team that created the paint.

Duolingo app

Now you can take music lessons on a smartphone, using this app, which uses an on-screen piano to teach basics such as harmony and beat. You learn by interacting with more than 200 popular pieces of music. Just match sounds to notes and play along. "You don't need natural talent to learn music," says Karen Chow, who's a learning scientist at Duolingo.

Model A

Model A, developed by Alef Aeronautics, is a two-seat all-electric vehicle with a flight range of 110 miles. And it looks as if it were made to be parked in a garage. In July, 2023, the Federal Aviation Administration gave Alef permission to take the vehicle on test flights. The company hopes to deliver the first Model A by 2026.

Moonwalkers

They're actually battery-powered shoes with wheels. They let you walk normally—just faster and more easily. Moonwalkers, made by Shift Robotics, use AI to sense when you're speeding up or slowing down, and adjust themselves accordingly. With it, you can walk at speeds up to seven miles per hour.

(1) What is special about Whiter Paint? A. It powers air conditioners. B. It warms our buildings. C. It absorbs more sunlight. D. It makes us feel cooler.
(2) Which one is being tested? A. Duolingo app. B. Whiter Paint. C. Moonwalkers. D. ModelA.
(3) What do the listed inventions have in common? A. They can help us live an easier life. B. They are supported by AI technology. C. They are favored by the disabled. D. They were created by college teams.
阅读理解 未知 普通
3. 阅读理解

Despite an ever-higher bar to grab the attention of students in large lecture hall, Tatiana Erukhimova, who teaches physics at Texas A&M University, has managed to get her students, as well as future generations, excited about the science, 

Known as "Dr. Tatiana". the professor performs physics tricks with boundless energy and enthusiasm in her videos. A range of everyday objects are used in her experiments, from pingpong balls and toilet paper to marshmallows. bicycle wheels and hair dryers. Videos of her dramatic demonstrations have received hundreds of millions of views across social media platforms. 

However, things aren't always easy. When she first started teaching college freshman classes two decades ago, she also struggled to grab the attention of her students. "I did not grab their attention on the first day-that was my mistake. "she says. "I missed this opportunity to bond with them from the very beginning, and then it took me a while to find my voice. "

By the second semester, she found her footing, adjusting her approach to get her students engaged. The key, she says, has been to make herself approachable and her instruction personal. And, of course, add showy demonstrations. "These demonstrations often help students to connect these abstract concepts with real life." she says.

Physics department head Grigory Rogachev says Erukhimova's work has helped bring visibility to the department, with about 2.5 million subscribers on its department's YouTube page, which has translated to a boost in research funds and physics major applicants. 

As a leader in a STEM field in which women are underrepresented, she's become a role model for some. Afiya Dhanani attended Texas A&M University after seeing Erukhimova's videos online. "Watching Dr. Tatiana do the experiments online, especially since she was a female leader. Was more inspiring for me to even go into physics. " Dhanani said in an interview with CBS Mornings. That's all Erakhimova says she can hope for -making physics less forbidding. and more exciting. 

(1) What does Erukhimova's online videos feature? A. Rare materials. B. Energetic presentation. C. Plain demonstration. D. Professional explanation.
(2) Which saying explains Erukhimova's initial failure to grab students' attention 20 years ago? A. All that glitters is not gold. B. Sharp tools make good work. C. First impressions are make or break. D. A fall into the pit, a gain in your wit.
(3) How does Erukhimova's work contribute to the physics department? A. It leads more students to change their majors. B. It makes more people to know about the department. C. It helps the department translate more research papers. D. It attracts more physics professors to join the department.
(4) Which word best describes Erukhimova as a leader in a STEM field? A. Inspirational. B. Underestimated. C. Cooperative. D. Ambitious.
阅读理解 未知 普通