1. 阅读短文,回答问题

Zion National Park in Utah has plenty of trails, but Angels Landing may be the most breathtaking. Picture this. You begin the hike on the wide and well-maintained West Rim Trail. It follows the river and then crosses the bottom of the canyon, surrounded by 270-million-year-old layers of rock. Relaxing, right? Just wait for it. The trail then starts to climb via a series of switchbacks (急转弯) leading up the side of the mountain. Then more switchbacks: 21 tighter turns, called "Walter's Wiggles, " where elevation levels rapidly increase. Your heartbeat is probably rapidly increasing at this point, too. 

On top of Walter's Wiggles, you can stop for a stunning view (perhaps with a marriage proposal) and a restroom stop while you contemplate (仔细考虑) the final stretch of the hike. If you're afraid of heights, it's best to turn back now. The last stretch is the real test of bravery. 

The last half mile of the hike is what really ranks it as one of the nation's most dangerous. Angels Landing itself is a fin-like formation jutting (突出) 1, 500 feet out of the canyon, and this is where you make the final 500-foot climb. Guardrails and chains bolted (拴住) into the cliff help you keep from tumbling over the extremely steep ledge. You're literally living on the edge, and you don't want to trust the "angels" down there to catch you. Once you reach the top, however, it'll all be worth it: 360-degree views of the canyon make a great backdrop for kicking back and having a meal before you come back down the way you came. 

Angels Landing might be dangerous, but thankfully, not too many people have had fatal falls. According to the park website, seven people have died in the 100 years the park has existed. Still, this is a very vigorous hike. If you're out of shape, bringing young children along, feel ill or prone to fainting, or are just plain afraid of heights, opt for an easier trail. 

Angel's Landing is a great hike for most of the year, besides the cold winter months when the trails could become dangerously slippery. Summer is the most popular time of year — and therefore the most crowded — but it can also get extremely hot, so opt for an early morning hike while the temperatures are still mild. 

Sure, it's dangerous, but there's a reason this is one of Zion 's most popular hikes. If you're up for the challenge, Angels Landing will definitely deliver rewards. 

This article first appeared on Curiosity. com.

(1) What geological feature surrounds the hiker during the initial part of the hike? A. Plenty of trails in the park. B. Mountain Peaks. C. 270-million-year-old layers of rock. D. Grass Meadows.
(2) What is the main attraction and appeal of Angels Landing? A. The challenging hike with switchbacks. B. The 360-degree views of the canyon. C. The well-maintained West Rim Trail. D. The river crossing and rock formations.
(3) Which of the following statement is true according to the passage? A. If a tourist is afraid of heights, it's best to turn back onto Angels Landing. B. Seven people have died so far due to slippery trails in winter. C. Bringing young kids along to climb onto Angels Landing will be appreciated. D. Taking a break with the views of the canyon as background is absolutely worth the trip.
(4) Which of the following could be the best title for the passage? A. Unveiling the Hidden Beauty: Exploring Zion National Park's Trails B. Zion's Ultimate Thrill: The Adrenaline-Pumping Angels Landing Expedition C. Chasing Heights: Angels Landing Adventure in Utah's Zion National Park D. Angels Landing: Conquering Utah's Breathtaking and Daring Hike in Zion National Park
【考点】
细节理解题; 说明文; 旅游观光类; 标题选择;
【答案】

您现在未登录,无法查看试题答案与解析。 登录
阅读理解 未知 普通
能力提升
真题演练
换一批
1.阅读理解

A POETRY CHALLENGE

Write a poem about how courage, determination, and strength have helped you face challenges in your life.

Prizes

3 Grand Prizes: Trip to Washington, D. C. for each of three winners, a parent and one other person of the winner's choice. Trip includes round-trip air tickets, hotel stay for two nights, and tours of the National Air and Space Museum and the office of National Geographic World.

6 First Prizes: The book Sky Pioneer: A Photo biography of Amelia Earhart signed by author Corinne Szabo and pilot Linda Finch.

50 Honorable Mentions: Judges will choose up to 50 honorable mention winners, who will each receive a T-shirt in memory of Earhart's final flight.

Rules

Follow all rules carefully to prevent disqualification.

■Write a poem using 100 words or fewer. Your poem can be any format, any number of lines.

■Write by hand or type on a single sheet of paper. You may use both the front and back of the paper.

■On the same sheet of paper, write or type your name, address, telephone number, and birth date.

■Mail your entry to us by October 31 this year.

(1) How many people can each grand prize winner take on the free trip? A. Two. B. Three. C. Four. D. Six.
(2) What will each of the honorable mention winners get? A. A plane ticket. B. A book by Corinne Szabo. C. A special T-shirt. D. A photo of Amelia Earhart.
(3) Which of the following will result in disqualification? A. Typing your poem out. B. Writing a poem of 120 words. C. Using both sides of the paper. D. Mailing your entry on October 30.
阅读理解 常考题 普通
2.阅读下列短文,从每题所给的A、B、C、D四个选项中选出最佳选项。

Covid-19 vaccines (疫苗) began saving lives in clinical trials. But a new study, based in part on The Economist's estimate of the pandemic's true death toll (伤亡人数), attempts to model just how many lives have been spared since vaccines became widely available to the public.

The study— published on June 23rd in Lancet Infectious Diseases— found that in the first year of vaccines that were invented and introduced to the public , jabs (注射疫苗) saved the lives of people between 19.1 million and 20.4 million. Without vaccines, the study estimates, roughly three times as many people would have died from Covid-19 in 2021 alone. And 6.8 million — 7.7millon of the prevented deaths were in countries covered by COVAX ( Covid-19 Vaccines Global Access), an initiative created to ensure vaccines were sent to poorer countries. Still, a lack of vaccines in some parts of the world still led to avoidable deaths. Around 100 countries failed to reach the World Health Organization's (WHO) goal of vaccinating 40% of their qualified populations by the end of 2021. The researchers estimate that this cost around 600,000 lives.

To arrive at these estimates, the researchers, Oliver J. Watson, Gregory Barnsley and their colleagues at Imperial College London, began with an existing transmission model used to track the spread of Covid-19 infections. They then combined this model with The Economist's estimate of the pandemic's true death toll to estimate how deadly the pandemic would have been without vaccines.

As for the study, every coin has two sides. It relies on assumptions about the share of estimated infections that led to death, for instance. Some small countries, which have limited reliable data, were not included in the analysis. That means the total number of actual avoided deaths will be even higher. On the other hand, the researchers did not attempt to model how people or governments might have changed their behavior to limit infections in the absence of vaccines. For all that, it is the most definitive answer yet to how many people owe their lives to the jabs.

(1) Why are the vaccines significant according to Paragraph 2? A. They can slow down the pain of the patients. B. They can reduce the number of death toll. C. They can promote the development of drugs. D. They can realize the WHO's achievement.
(2) How do the researchers at Imperial College London draw the estimates? A. By developing the transmission model. B. By comparing data between model and study. C. By combining with the previous study. D. By tracking the spread of infections.
(3) What is Paragraph 4 mainly about? A. The limitations of the study. B. The assumptions of the study. C. The results of the study. D. The advantages of the study.
(4) What's the author's opinion about the current situation of vaccines? A. Uncertain. B. Pessimistic. C. Cautious. D. Confident.
阅读理解 常考题 普通
3.阅读理解

In 1926, US automaker Henry Ford shortened its employees' workweek from six eight-hour days to five, with no pay cuts. It's something workers and labor unions had been calling for. Ford wasn't responding to worker demands: he was being a businessman. He expected increased productivity and knew workers with more time and money would buy and use the products they were making. It was a way of encouraging consumerism and productivity to increase profits, and it succeeded.

Since standardization of the 40-hour workweek in the mid-20th century, everything has changed but the hours. If anything, many people are working even longer hours, especially in North America. This has a severe influence on human health and well-being, as well as the environment. Until the Second World War, it was common for one person in a family, usually the oldest male, to work full-time. Now, women make up 42 percent of the world's full-time workforce. Technology has made a lot of work unnecessary, with computers and robots doing many tasks previously performed by humans.

Well into the 21st century, we continue to work the same long hours as 20th century laborers, using up ever more of Earth's supply to produce more goods that we must keep working to buy, use and replace in a seemingly endless cycle of hard work and consumption. It's time to pause and consider better ways to live like shifting from fossil-fueled lifestyles with which our consumer-based workweeks are connected.

The UK think tank, New Economics (经济学)Foundation, argues that a standard 21-hour workweek would address a number of interconnected problems: "overwork,unemployment, over-consumption, high carbon emissions, low well-being, and the lack of time to live sustainably, to care for each other, and simply to enjoy life".

Economic systems that require constant growth on a finite(有限的)planet don't make sense. It's time for a change in our economic thinking.

(1) Why did Ford decide to shorten the workweek? A. To cut workers' pay. B. To make more profits. C. To respond to worker demands. D. To meet labor unions' requirements.
(2) What change in the workforce happened after World War IT? A. More women worked full-time. B. The number of laborers decreased. C. Technology enabled people to work shorter hours. D. It was unnecessary for a family's oldest male to work.
(3) What can we infer from the third paragraph? A. Longer working hours means better consumption ability. B. The 21st century sees the longest working hours in history. C. The cycle of hard work and consumption should be changed. D. Pausing our way of living can change the present workweek.
(4) New Economics Foundation thinks a 21-hour workweek will        . A. increase unemployment B. cause various problems C. encourage people to enjoy life D. challenge the economic growth
阅读理解 常考题 普通