1.阅读理解

My head was so full of digital noise that it felt like my brain was about to blow a fuse (导火线). I had no greater power of concentration than the lifeless stare of a goldfish. As a writer, I was ashamed to admit that my love of books had been compromised by a brain that simply could not sit still.

So, this year I committed myself to restoring books to the place that they held in my life before the Internet broke my brain.

My goal was 52 books: It seemed like an impossible task. A 400-page book will take the average person around eight hours to read. Finding the time to read was a challenge but here's how I did it. Firstly, I decided to treat my mind like a misbehaving child who needs some rules laid down. Then I decided that I would read for an hour or two at a time without distraction each day. It was something I hadn't done in years and it was scary how difficult it was.

In his book, The Distracted Mind, Larry Rosen says that the more we practice spending time away from our electronic devices, the calmer and more focused we become. And this is what I found. Again and again, I would gently bring myself back to the page, resisting the urge to reach for that screen. I took inspiration from Nikki Gemmell, who describes in On Quiet, how investing in a safe to lock away her family's devices for long periods had opened up a space for deep reflection. For me, finding that quiet time meant finding time in my day just to read. It was like a date between me and my book. And it meant actively choosing to read at times when I normally would reach for my phone. I read on the tram, at the park, in bed at night and on lunch breaks.

By reawakening my love with books I created a sacred space where I could press pause and found inspiration, knowledge, reflection and escape. In our modern world, reading is a powerful and beneficial way for us to slow down and be ourselves.

(1) What does the underlined word "compromised" mean in the first paragraph? A. Rejected. B. Disturbed. C. Weakened. D. Removed.
(2) What was the first thing the author did to achieve the goal? A. The author went to the bookstore to buy books. B. The author was determined to make rules for himself. C. The author was buried in reading for an hour or two at once D. The author decided to get involved in reading with people around.
(3) What can we infer about the author? A. The author benefited a lot from reading books. B. The author got inspiration when he reached for the screen C. The author would rather read books outdoors than indoors D. The author was reminded to kill time with electronic devices.
(4) Which of the following can be the best title for the text? A. Falling in love with reading B. Resisting the urge to reach for the screen C. Going back to the books D. Escaping from the noisy world in reading
【考点】
推理判断题; 词义猜测题; 细节理解题; 故事阅读类; 记叙文; 标题选择;
【答案】

您现在未登录,无法查看试题答案与解析。 登录
阅读理解 未知 普通
能力提升
真题演练
换一批
1.阅读理解

D

Marketers assume the more choice they offer, the more likely customers will be able to find just the right thing. For instance, offering fifty styles of jeans instead of two increases the chances that shoppers will find a pair they really like. Nevertheless, research now shows when there is too much choice, consumers are less likely to buy anything at all, and if they do buy, they are less satisfied with their selection.

It all began with jam. In 2000, psychologists Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper published a remarkable study. On one day, shoppers saw a display table with 24 varieties of jam. Those sampling the jam received a coupon for $1 off any jam. On another day, shoppers saw a similar table, but only six varieties of jam were on display. The large display attracted more interest than the small one. But when the time for purchase came, people seeing the large display were one-tenth as likely to buy as people seeing the small one.

Other studies have confirmed this result that more choice is not always better. As the variety of snacks, soft drinks and beers offered at convenience stores increases, for instance, sales volume and customer satisfaction decrease. These results challenge our opinions about human nature and the determinants of well-being.

Choice is good for us, but its relationship to satisfaction appears to be more complicated than we assumed. What's more, psychologists and business academics have largely ignored another outcome of choice: More of it requires increased time and effort and can lead to anxiety, regret, excessively high expectations and self-blame if the choice doesn't work out.

Without doubt, having more options enables us, most of the time, to achieve better objective outcomes. Again, having fifty styles of jeans rather than two increases the likelihood that customers will find a pair that fits. But the subjective outcome may be that shoppers will feel dissatisfied, which creates a significant challenge for retailers and marketers. Choice can no longer be used to justify a marketing strategy. More isn't always better, either for the customer or for the retailer.

(1) How does the author mainly support the topic? A. By quoting sayings. B. By giving examples. C. By stating arguments. D. By making comments.
(2) Why does too much choice sometimes bring challenges to customers? A. It always wastes customers' time. B. It's difficult to accept the bad results. C. It may result in some negative feelings. D. It makes the business more complicated.
(3) What can we infer from the last paragraph? A. More choice leads to shopping themselves. B. Choice plays an important role in marketing strategies. C. Having fifty styles of jeans is extremely better than two. D. More choice causes the decline in consumption to some degree.
(4)  What may be the best title for the text? A. Less choice does harm B. More isn't always better C. More purchase is better D. Less choice favors consumption
阅读理解 未知 普通
2.阅读理解

Adult Summer Reading

How to participate (参加):

Starting Saturday July1 sign at the Circulation Desk and receive a Summer Reading T-shirt! Enter a raffle ticket (彩票) for each book you read for a chance to win a weekly prize.

Read any book of your chance. The more you read, the greater your chance to win a prize! Entries must be received by Tuesday, August 22 at 9pm.

Notes:Send us a photo of yourself wearing your Summer Reading T-shit to framinghams ummerreading@ gmail. com for a chance to win a grand prize.

What you can win:

Weekly prizes will be drawn on the following days

July10- Gift card for a dozen donuts donated (捐赠) by Cael Bagel

July 17- ﹩5 gift card donated by Mad Willes

July 24- ﹩5 gift card donated by Mad Willes

July31- ﹩10 gift card to Barnes and Noble donated by the Friends of the Framingham Library

August7 ﹩10 gift card to Barnes and Noble donated by the Friends of the Framingham Library

August14- ﹩25 gift card donated by Zaftig Delicatessen

Grand prize

880 gift card to Barnes&Noble or a Kindle Paper white donated by the Friends of the Framingham Library

The Finale Concert

Wednesday. August 23 at 7pm Costin Room, Main Library

The grand prize winners will be drawn, followed by a concert by The Love Dogs. Enjoy ice cream donated by Ben & Jerry's Natick.

For more information: Call 508-532-5570 x4351 or visit www. Framingham library. org

(1) How can you get a chance to win a grand prize? A. Register in advance. B. Read a book every month. C. Collect as many raffle tickets as possible. D. Send a photo according to the rule.
(2) What prize can you win for the third week? A. ﹩5 gift card. B. ﹩10 gift card. C. ﹩25 gift card. D. ﹩80 gift card.
(3) What can we know about the finale concert? A. Every participant can go to the concert B. The participant should pay for the ice cream C. Information about it can be got on the website D. All the prizes will be announced during the event
阅读理解 常考题 普通
3.阅读理解

Many people have participated into lots of virtual meetings these years. Some research shows this adjustment might not impact workplace productivity to any great degree. A new study, though, suggests otherwise.

In the study, 602 participants were randomly paired and asked to come up with creative uses for a product. They were also randomly selected to work together either in person or virtually. The pairs were then ranked by assessing their total number of ideas, as well as those concepts' degree of novelty, and asked to submit their best idea. Among the groups, virtual pairs came up with significantly fewer ideas, suggesting that something about face-to-face interaction generates more creative ideas. The findings could stiffen employers' resolve to urge or require their employees to come back to the office.

"We ran this experiment based on feedback from companies that it was harder to innovate with remote workers," said lead researcher Melanie Brucks. "Unlike other forms of virtual communication, like phone calls or e-mail, videoconferencing copies the in-person experience quite well, so I was surprised when we found meaningful differences between in-person and video interaction for idea generation."

When random objects were placed in both the virtual and physical rooms, the virtual pairs of participants spent more time looking directly at each other rather than letting their look wander about the room and taking in the entire scene. Eyeing one's whole environment and noticing the random objects were associated with increased idea generation. On platforms, the screen occupies our interactions. Our look wavers less. "Looking away might come across as rude," said Brucks, "so we have to look at the screen because that is the defined context of the interaction, the same way we wouldn't walk to another room while talking to someone in person."

Like most educators, Brucks has primarily taught virtually in the past three years, and she did notice some benefits of the approach as well. Her students were more likely to take turns speaking and her shyer students spoke up more often, rid of the anxiety that comes from addressing a large classroom. Brucks found that one solution to improving virtual idea generation might be to simply turn off the camera, for her students felt "freer" and more creative when asked to do so. And this may be sound advice for the workplace.

Virtual teamwork can't replace face-to-face teamwork. Idea selection proficiency (能力) is only valuable if you have strong options to select from, and face-to-face teams are the best means to generate winning options. Perhaps the workplace will find a compromise—a sweet spot in the middle that balances working from both home and office.

(1) What does the underlined word "stiffen" in Paragraph 2 most probably mean? A. Shake. B. Revise. C. Challenge. D. Strengthen.
(2) At first, lead researcher Melanie Brucks might think that ______. A. videoconferencing can't compare with in-person communication B. participants should make eye contact in an online meeting C. the feedback from companies seems questionable D. creative ideas may emerge from casual thoughts
(3) What can we learn about Brucks' class? A. Her students relieved anxiety by speaking up. B. Her students progressed in focusing attention. C. Her students took advantage of virtual learning. D. Her students displayed talent for public speaking.
(4) Which of the following would be the best title for the passage? A. Interacting Virtually Impacts Working Participation B. Maintaining Teamwork Improves Idea Generation C. Grouping Randomly Increases Productivity D. Brainstorming Online Limits Creativity
阅读理解 未知 普通