Many parents confused by how their children shop or socialize, would feel undisturbed by how they are taught—this sector remains digitally behind. Can artificial intelligence boost the digital sector of classroom? ChatGPT-like generative AI is generating excitement for providing personalized tutoring to students. By May. New York had let the bot back into classrooms.
Learners are accepting the technology. Two-fifths of undergraduates surveyed last y car by online tutoring company Chegg reported using an AI chatbot to help them with their studies, with half of those using it daily. Chegg's chief executive told investors it was losing customers to ChatGPT as a result of the technology's popularity. Yet there are good reasons to believe that education specialists who harness AI will eventually win over generalists such as Open AI and other tech firms eyeing the education business.
For one, AI chat bots have a bad habit of producing nonsense. "Students want content from trusted providers," argues Kate Edwards from a textbook publisher. Her company hasn't allowed ChatGPT and other AIs to use its material, but has instead used the content to train its own models into its learning apps. Besides, teaching isn't merely about giving students an answer, but about presenting it in a way that helps them learn. Charbots must also be tailored to different age groups to avoid either cheating or infantilizing(使婴儿化) students.
Bringing AI to education won't be easy. Many teachers are behind the learning curve. Less than a fifth of British educators surveyed by Pearson last year reported receiving training on digital learning tools. Tight budgets at many institutions will make selling new technology an uphill battle. Teachers' attention may need to shift towards motivating students and instructing them on how to best work with AI tools. If those answers can be provided, it's not just companies that stand to benefit. An influent in l paper from 1984 found that one-to-one tutoring improved the average academic performance of students. With the learning of students, especially those from poorer households, held back, such a development would certainly deserve top marks.