1.  阅读理解

Two and a half millennia ago, Socrates complained that writing would harm students. With a way to store ideas permanently and externally, they would no longer need to memorize. However, studies today have found that writing on paper can improve everything from recalling a random series of words to better understanding complex concepts.

For learning material by repetition, the benefits of using a pen or pencil lie in how the motor and sensory memory of putting words on paper reinforces that material. The scribbling (涂鸦) on a page feeds into visual memory: people might remember a word they wrote down in French class as being at the bottom-left on a page.

One of the best-demonstrated advantages of writing by hand seems to be in note-taking. Students typing on computers wrote down almost twice as many words directly from lectures, suggesting they were not understanding so much as rapidly copying the material. However, handwriting forces note-takers to process and organize ideas into their own words. This aids conceptual understanding at the moment of writing, resulting in better performance on tests.

Many studies have confirmed handwriting's benefits, and policymakers have taken note. Though America's curriculum from 2010 does not require handwriting instruction past first grade (roughly age six), about half the states since then have required more teaching of it. In Sweden there is a push for more handwriting and printed books and fewer devices. England's national curriculum already includes the teaching of basic cursive writing (连写体) skills by age seven.

However, several school systems in America have gone so far as to ban most laptops. This is too extreme. Some students have disabilities that make handwriting especially hard. Nearly all will eventually need typing skills. Virginia Berninger, professor of psychology at the University of Washington, is a longtime advocate of handwriting. But she is not a purist; she says there are research tested benefits for "manuscript" print-style writing but also for typing.

Socrates may or may not have had a point about the downsides of writing. But no one would remember, much less care, if his student Plato had not noted it down for the benefit of future generations.

(1) According to the text, why does writing on paper have benefits for learning? A. It provides visual enjoyment in class. B. It improves the effect of memorization. C. It promotes the motor and sensory ability. D. It helps to remember the information forever.
(2) How does the author show the emphasis on handwriting instruction at school? A. By giving examples. B. By providing statistics. C. By making comparisons. D. By making classification.
(3) What is paragraph 5 mainly about? A. Difficulties faced by the disabled. B. Unreasonableness of forbidding typing. C. The research-tested benefits of typing. D. The longtime advocacy for handwriting.
(4) Why does the writer mention Socrates and Plato in the last paragraph? A. To thank Plato for his efforts. B. To defend Socrates' point of view. C. To show people's indifference to typing. D. To confirm the importance of handwriting.
【考点】
推理判断题; 细节理解题; 段落大意; 说明文; 社会文化类;
【答案】

您现在未登录,无法查看试题答案与解析。 登录
阅读理解 普通
能力提升
真题演练
换一批
1.  阅读理解

Recently I've been drawn to books which motivate me to look at myself, and hopefully make me a better "me". The Courage to Be Disliked, by Ichiro Kishimi and Fumitake Koya, has a title I just can't go past.

The book has taken Japan by storm, using the theories of philosopher Alfred Adler to create conversations between a fictional philosopher and a young man. The conversations cover many broad, interesting and sensitive topics. The philosopher character sticks by the theories of Adler, and explains how we are competent to determine our own lives, and be free of the influence of past experiences and others' expectations. It's a way of thinking that allows us to develop the courage to change and to ignore the limitations placed on us.

These often complex topics are played out in a conversational style between the two men. While it's easy to follow the conversations, the topics will knock around in your own head as you work out whether you sit on the side of the philosopher, the young man, or somewhere in between. The book is well-received by readers primarily owing to the fact that it presents two well-balanced viewpoints in the arguments. You'll find yourself doing household chores, or at your keyboard, unpacking all the information in your mind and coming to your own conclusions.

You will wholeheartedly agree on some points and want to throw the book at the wall at others. Its content is polarizing (两极分化) and I certainly don't agree with everything the philosopher or the young man says, but I think that's the point. The Courage to Be Disliked is there to start a conversation with yourself and do some slightly uncomfortable soul-searching.

(1) Which category does the book belong to? A. Self-improvement. B. Philosophy theory. C. Collection of experiences. D. Biography of Alfred Adler.
(2) Which statement might the fictional philosopher agree with? A. People are free of their past influence. B. People can take charge of their life course. C. People should live up to others' expectations. D. People ought to take their limitations seriously.
(3) How does the book develop? A. By listing sufficient data. B. By making comparisons. C. By following the time line. D. By presenting dialogues.
(4) Why is the book popular with readers? A. It shows ideas in plain language. B. It displays the scientific statistics. C. It offers balanced sides to the topics. D. It avoids the use of philosophic terms.
阅读理解 普通
2. 阅读理解

The word paradigm comes from the Greek. It was originally a scientific term, and is more commonly used today to mean a model or theory. In the more general sense, it's the way we "see" the world--not in terms of our visual sense of sight, but in terms of perceiving, understanding, and interpreting.

A simple way to understand paradigms is to see them as maps. We all know that "the map is not the territory." A map is simply an explanation of certain aspects of the territory. That's exactly what a paradigm is. It is a theory, an explanation, or model of something else. You can never arrive at a specific location in a new city with a wrong map.

Each of us has many maps in our head, which can be divided into two main categories: maps of the way things are, or realities, and maps of the way things should be, or values. We interpret every thing we experience through these mental maps. We seldom question their accuracy; we're usually even unaware that we have them. We simply assume that the way we see things is the way they really are or the way they should be. And our attitudes and behaviors grow out of those assumptions. The way we see things is the source of the way we think and the way we act.

We see the world, not as it is, but as we are--or, as we are conditioned to see it. Clear headed people see things differently, each looking through the unique lens of experience. But this does not mean that there are no facts. Instead, each person's interpretation of these facts represents prior experiences.

The more aware we are of our basic paradigms, maps, or assumptions, and the extent to which we have been influenced by our experience, the more we can take responsibility for those paradigms, examine them, test them against reality, listen to others and be open to their perceptions, thereby getting a larger picture and a far more objective view.

(1) How does the author illustrate the concept of "paradigm"? A. By comparing it to an everyday object. B. By sorting it into different categories. C. By presenting personal examples. D. By highlighting a sharp contrast.
(2) What can be concluded about the mental maps mentioned in paragraph 3? A. They fail to escape our attention. B. They may be lacking in accuracy. C. They prove wrong and unreliable. D. They have little influence on behavior.
(3) Which of the following echoes the main idea of paragraph 4? A. Great minds think alike. B. All men have opinions, but few think. C. Where we stand depends on where we sit. D. The fewer the facts, the stronger the opinions.
(4) What does the author advocate in the last paragraph? A. A better understanding of our paradigms. B. A stronger sense of responsibility for others. C. A more objective view of others' perceptions. D. A more positive attitude toward life experience.
阅读理解 普通
3. 阅读理解

Queen Elizabeth II's face is on every note and coin in the United Kingdom, but still little is known about how much money she has personally, how she gets it and who stands to inherit (继承) it.

What we do know from public records is that the Queen receives at least $20 million in annual income through her private estate,and another 100 million dollars from the UK government each year.

The first thing to understand is that the Queen's income comes from both public and private possessions. A large amount of it comes from something called the Sovereign Grant. Here's how that works.

In the 1700s, the monarchy (王室) handed over income from land to the government known as the Crown Estate. Each year the government pays a percentage of the profits made on those possessions back to the monarchy. That annual income is known as the Sovereign Grant. Last year it totaled more than $107 million. And it is used to fund the Queen's official duties and maintain royal residences like Buckingham Palace.

But even if we can't identify her exact worth, the royal finances are looking healthy as the

Queen celebrates her 70th Queen Ceremony. The Sunday Times Rich List estimated the Queen's net worth is $466 million, up $6. 2 million dollars from last year. And while the Duchy of Lancaster saw UK income drop during the pandemic, according to its financial records, the Queen's income has been turning upwards over the past decade.

Anyway, the monarchy is a private family, and they are unlikely to share any details of their wealth with the British public, and that probably won't change anytime soon.

(1) How does the Queen get her income? A. From the Crown Estate. B. From the Sovereign Grant. C. From the monarchy and the government. D. From the government and private possessions.
(2) What's the main idea of Paragraph 4? A. How the Queen's income is calculated. B. How the monarchy cooperates with the government. C. How the Sovereign Grant works and what the money is used for. D. How the monarchy gets paid and what the Queen's official duties are.
(3) What can be inferred about the Queen's income from Paragraph 5? A. It can be exactly identified. B. It decreases during the pandemic. C. It is more than that from last year. D. It is more than that of the UK government.
(4) Which section may the text be taken from? A. Health. B. History. C. Education. D. Economy.
阅读理解 普通