1.阅读理解

Since 2018, Jason has been helping sick kids become superheroes. After watching his then one-year-old daughter Angela undergo chemotherapy (化疗), he came up with the idea of "Supertees". Designed with a cape, the shirts act as a virtual armour (盔甲) for children fighting the worst villain of all- cancer. 

"Sitting by her hospital bed I. knew there was nothing I could do to help Angela, until I noticed how hard it was to change her clothes while she was connected to various monitors. This is when the idea for the Supertee was born, " says Jason, whose daughter had a rare cancer then.   

Created to look like a superhero costume, for Jason, the medical garments are all about enabling children to see themselves as the strong superheroes they idolise. "We want these kids to feel like, and be recognized as, the heroes that we see them as, "he tells.  

Now Jason has teamed up with Disney to launch a new Marvel Edition tee. And he's got some very "super" friends helping him out! Actors Larson and Chris have lent their support, sharing special video messages for the kids who receive a new Supertee modelled after their costumes. 

The collaboration with Disney is special for Jason. "I promised I would take her to Disneyland the moment we could leave the hospital, " says Jason, a pledge they happily fulfilled. 

Since June 2018, Jason and his team have delivered more than 13, 000 Supertees to sick children in hospitals around Australia, including Melbourne schoolboy Riley Sinclair, who was diagnosed with a serious disease at just seven years old. 

For Riley's mum Tammy, the Supertee was a game changer for her son, now 11, helping him feel less afraid and making hospital visits more comfortable. "When Riley puts his tee on, his whole personality will change and he feels like he can face anything. It's amazing!" explains Tammy. 

(1) What is "Supertee"?  A. A customized shirt for sick kids. B. A special hospital for kids. C. A virtual armour for kids. D. A super hero of kids.
(2)  What inspired Jason's idea of "Supertee"? A. His cooperation with Disney. B. His chat with doctors in hospital. C. His own experience of being hospitalized. D. His caring for his daughter in hospital.
(3) What does the underlined word "idolise" in paragraph 3 mean? A. Envy. B. Adore. C. Hate. D. Create.
(4)  Why does the author mention Riley's case? A. To prove the Supertee's role in a game. B. To explain why the Supertee is so popular. C. To indicate that the Supertee does work. D. To reflect the Supertee's medical effectiveness.
【考点】
推理判断题; 词义猜测题; 细节理解题; 故事阅读类; 记叙文;
【答案】

您现在未登录,无法查看试题答案与解析。 登录
阅读理解 未知 普通
能力提升
真题演练
换一批
1.阅读理解

Halloween candy could be in for a California big change. State lawmakers last month passed the California Food Safety Act, which bans four materials found in popular snacks and packaged foods - including candy corm and other Halloween treats. Set to take effect in 2027, the ban will lead candy and food producers to change their formulas for products sold both in California and elsewhere around the country. 

The law bans the production and sale of some materials, which are used in processed foods including kinds of instant potatoes and sodas, as well as candies. The additives (添加剂) have been linked to increased risks of cancer and nervous system problems, according to the Environmental Working Group, which started the act, and are already banned in many other countries. 

Food producers and their lobbyists (说客) opposed the law, arguing the conclusion that the four additives are unhealthy should be made by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). They thought that evaluating the safety of food materials and additives should rely on the scientific accuracy of the FDA. But food safety advocates say the FDA has moved far too slowly in regulating food chemicals. It's unacceptable that the U.S. is so far behind the rest of the world when it comes to food safety. 

California's act made headlines this year as a "Skittles (彩虹糖) ban" that would wipe popular candies off California shelves. But supporters of the act said the intention is simply to require changes in the materials, as has already happened in Europe. Perhaps the most standing-out material on California's banned list is red dye No. 

3. It is allowed only in candied and cocktail cherries in the European Union but more than 3,000 products contain the chemical in the U. S. The list includes items like frosted pretzels and scores of brand-name candies such as Peeps and Pez. It also includes items like fruit cocktail cups, protein drinks, and yogurts.

(1) How will Halloween candy in California change? A. It will change its recipes. B. It will transform its shapes. C. It will move out of California. D. It will disappear completely.
(2)  What idea do food producers have against the act? A. FDA's conclusion on the materials is wrong. B. Four materials are allowed all over the world. C. The materials' safety needs to be reassessed. D. FDA moves too fast in regulating food chemicals.
(3) What can we infer about the act supporters' request about Skittles? A. They demand a complete ban on Skittles. B. They wish the "Skittles ban" to be headlines. C. They want to apply European policies to Skittles. D. They hope more red dye No. 3 is used in Skittles.
(4) What is the text mainly about? A. California candy ban. B. Food safety in California. C. The responsibility of FDA.     D. Change of Halloween Candy.
阅读理解 未知 普通
2.阅读理解

Max Du won the Canada-Wide Science Fair. His project is a drone (无人机) to save people who go into cardiac (心脏的) arrest. Max got the inspiration during Christmas break last year. "I got a toy drone from my parents, but I couldn't fly it because it is snowy." Max said. "So I played with it at home, and it got me thinking how a drone could be used as an indoor robot that could help people."

About 35, 000 people have cardiac arrests in Canada each year. Most of those happen outside of a hospital, of whom fewer than 10 percent survive. Max believed a drone could offer faster support and life-saving medicine, but he had to build it himself to know for sure.

Testing his drone took about six months. Max's parents had to deal with their son's constantly flying and crashing in the home. Every time Max would create an exciting innovation, such as an extendable arm, it would add extra weight to his drone, causing it to break apart. Then Max would have to buy all new parts. Max tested using more lightweight materials until his design was more balanced.

Through trial and error, the 14-year-old boy finally got it right. His drone can open a door handle, fly in the air and then land softly on the ground. A new extendable arm can be released to administer a shot or hand a patient lifesaving medicine. A built-in camera could directly conference with an emergency response team whose members could monitor the patient remotely.

Max plans on applying for a patent (专利) so he can make connections in the health-care industry to get it made for real. He's spent his summer learning about artificial intelligence at California's Stanford University as one of 32 kids selected worldwide. He'll head next to the University of Pennsylvania to take a college-level robotics class before returning to high school in September.

(1)  Why did Max Du design a drone by himself? A. He had sympathy for those with heart attacks. B. He had nothing to do in Christmas holidays. C. He wanted use it to help his parents. D. He tried to make it fly in the snow.
(2) What can we learn from paragraphs 2 and 3? A. Most of the people with cardiac arrests in Canada can survive. B. Max's parents were unwilling to help during his drone design. C. It's very important to control the balance of the drone. D. Max's design of the extendable arm is very smooth.
(3) What does paragraph 4 mainly talk about? A. The instructions for using the drone. B. The reason for applying for a patent. C. The process of Max's success. D. The functions of the new drone.
(4) Which of the following can best describe Max? A. Considerate and brave. B. Talented and creative. C. Clever and honest. D. Helpful and loyal.
阅读理解 未知 普通
3.阅读理解

Colin Chapman, the founder of Lotus Cars, was one of motor racing's most influential engineers. He summed up his philosophy as "simplify, then add lightness". A simple, featherweight car might be slower on the straights than a beefy muscle-machine, he reasoned. But it would be faster everywhere else. Between 1962 and 1978 Lotus won seven Formula One constructors championships.

It appears to be an uncommon insight since humans always struggle with subtractive thinking. When asked to improve something, they tend to suggest adding new things rather than removing some, even when additions lead to not satisfying results. In one study conducted by Gabrielle Adams, along with colleagues at the University of Virginia, participants were asked to change a pattern on a grid (网格) of coloured squares to make it balanced. Although that could be done equally well by adding new squares or by deleting existing ones, 78% chose the additive option.

But why people forget that less is often more? One experiment asked participants to redesign an unbalanced Lego structure so that it could support a house-brick. Participants could earn a dollar for fixing the problem, but each piece of Lego they added cut that reward by ten cents. Even then, only 41% worked out that simplifying the structure by removing a single block, rather than complicating it by adding more, was the way to maximise the payout. Practice improved people's chances of spotting subtractive solutions, suggesting that many were simply not thinking of the possibility, at least at first.

What all this amounts to is evidence for " additive thinking" entering the list of" cognitive biases" (认知偏差). The 2002 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences was awarded for demonstrating that humans are not thinking logically as economists do. Instead of thinking a problem through and coming up with an ideal solution, they tend to use cognitive shortcuts that are fast and—mostly—"good enough".

(1) Why is Chapman's case mentioned in paragraph 1 ? A. To prove his philosophy. B. To introduce the topic. C. To support the argument. D. To provide an example.
(2) What were the participants asked to do in Adams's study? A. To balance a pattern. B. To plus new squares. C. To delete original squares. D. To change a pattern's colour.
(3) What can we know about subtractive thinking from paragraph 3? A. It can make things more complex. B. It is a shortcut to gaining a fortune. C. It can be facilitated through practice. D. It is a common way to tackle problems.
(4) What does the author try to convey through the text? A. Less is often more. B. Think less and act more. C. Additive thinking is a shortcut. D. Economists think more logically.
阅读理解 模拟题 普通